Federal Appeals Court Rules Pledge of Allegiance Unconstitutional
SAN FRANCISCO -- For the first time ever, a federal appeals court on Wednesday declared the Pledge of Allegiance unconstitutional because of the words "under God" added by Congress in 1954.
......
Interesting....
SAN FRANCISCO -- For the first time ever, a federal appeals court on Wednesday declared the Pledge of Allegiance unconstitutional because of the words "under God" added by Congress in 1954.
......
Interesting....
no subject
Date: 2002-06-26 01:13 pm (UTC)"A profession that we are a nation 'under God' is identical, for Establishment Clause purposes, to a profession that we are a nation 'under Jesus,' a nation 'under Vishnu,' a nation 'under Zeus,' or a nation 'under no god,' because none of these professions can be neutral with respect to religion," Judge Alfred T. Goodwin wrote for the three-judge panel.
Re:
Date: 2002-06-26 01:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2002-06-26 01:41 pm (UTC)Of course, one of my friends pointed out that this was ruled by the 9th Circuit Court, which according to him is "the most overturned of any of the appellate courts."
Will the money ("In God We Trust") be next?
no subject
Date: 2002-06-26 01:28 pm (UTC)that seems a bit
*shrugs*
pinickity
if that's aword
it's like burning churches etc...
O_O'''
can you grab Cub's opinion for me?
Re:
Date: 2002-06-26 01:44 pm (UTC)Re:
Date: 2002-06-26 01:58 pm (UTC)borrow it?
ask him?
hug him?
snuzzle him?
fondle him?
you choose!
no subject
Date: 2002-06-26 01:57 pm (UTC)Re:
Date: 2002-06-26 02:03 pm (UTC)bear in mind my warped mind
but it's likea witch hunt on all that was seen as normal before
so I guess the next step
after taking Christianity out of everything
is it destroy it
in hail and brimstone
etc...
*hugs*
Re:
Date: 2002-06-26 03:06 pm (UTC)No Separation in the UK
Re:
Date: 2002-06-27 03:32 am (UTC)well I *am* a teenage Nun so I'm hardly going to watch my religion fade away happily
duh /|^_^|\ (nun face?)
yes
go me the amazing thinking nun
Bug got the stuff ^_^ and he seems happy ^_^ yay!
Re:
Date: 2002-06-27 06:12 am (UTC)I'm glad!
Re:
Date: 2002-06-28 03:43 am (UTC)I dunno
*thinks some more*
there isn't that much coverage of it over here
but it just seems like if ONE person thinks something then the whole thing has to change
obviously more than one person in this case
but sometimes they demand the stupiest thing in the name of equality and it just sounds more hypocritical
did that make sense?
*cuddles*
Re:
Date: 2002-06-28 06:18 am (UTC)Re:
Date: 2002-06-29 01:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2002-06-26 04:03 pm (UTC)in god we trust is all over it....
heeeeeeeeeeey american money is unconstitutional.....maybe we should switch to the euro too....*shudders*
no subject
Date: 2002-06-26 04:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2002-06-26 11:00 pm (UTC)no subject
There are SO many more important issues on dividing church from state that could be seen to before something like this. I mean, in some states they are teaching Biblical creationism as "History" or as a legitimate scientific approach to Origin of the Human Species. Now THESE are areas that we need to get at, not the stupid Pledge of Allegiance. All this opinion will do is galvinize the Far Right and much of the Center into yet ANOTHER tiresome frothing frenzy. What IS the POINT???