(no subject)
Apr. 21st, 2004 07:06 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Well, the idiots in the Virginia Legislature have made sure there is no way in hell I will ever move back to the Commonwealth:
Assembly rejects Governor's amendment to bill on gay unions
Not only did they ban marriage, but also partnerships, and the damned thing is written so sloppily that it could even potentialy stop same-sex couples from doing things like setting up powers of attorney.
Morons. Absolute morons.
I tell you this, though - I will do research and find out what, if any, products I'm buying from Virginia companies and tell them that I will no longer use their products as long as they stay in Virginia. If they're going to support that government with their tax money, I'm not going to spend my money there. And frankly, I hope that other organizations will take note and announce a boycott.
Assembly rejects Governor's amendment to bill on gay unions
Not only did they ban marriage, but also partnerships, and the damned thing is written so sloppily that it could even potentialy stop same-sex couples from doing things like setting up powers of attorney.
Morons. Absolute morons.
I tell you this, though - I will do research and find out what, if any, products I'm buying from Virginia companies and tell them that I will no longer use their products as long as they stay in Virginia. If they're going to support that government with their tax money, I'm not going to spend my money there. And frankly, I hope that other organizations will take note and announce a boycott.
no subject
Date: 2004-04-21 07:49 pm (UTC)Virginia Legislature
Date: 2004-04-22 06:49 am (UTC)The spirit of bill doesn't surprise me. But the actual text manifestation is very very sloppy. Presumably they mean ANY privilege, not ALL privileges. Is there any other interpretation? They know exactly what they mean and don't mean, and yet they refuse to enumerate. If they refuse to name it, they must at least enumerate. They mean the ones that REQUIRE explicit government consent... tax status, social security benefits, the government bestowed right to force your employer to give your spouse health insurance, the government bestowed right to force an employer to give you FMLA leave, etc.
If people knew what they were really doing when they got married, more than just few would appreciate a real alternative if it existed.
I think what we desperately need in this country are marriage reporting agencies, similar to our credit reporting agencies. The Christian Coalition can have one if they like, with its own standards. And I'm sure there would be quite a few others that would attract a following as well so as to become well established and respected, and a source of accurate information for businesses and goverment alike... just like the credit agencies.
Governments could still choose what to recognize and what not to recognize. Governments could still choose to only recognize those agencies that explicitly record gender, and not to recognize same sex couples. But at least it would restore freedom to choose and set the stage for the real debates.
As it is, the government is only denying us a special right that no citizens should have. Its tough to argue for it except on a "hey, we're equal, right?" basis.
no subject
Date: 2004-04-22 07:30 am (UTC)I still live in VA... I tend to like to fight the fight from the inside. Definitly starting some letters today to my local reps.
Rick