Trail Peeves
Jul. 19th, 2004 09:37 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
There are three consistent pet peeves I have with the bicyclists I see while out running in Rock Creek Park. In order of frequency of appearance (and in descending order of annoyance):
1. Cyclists who don't wear a helmet.
2. Cyclists who "sneak up on you" (i.e., they don't ring a bell or yell out or otherwise indicate that they are coming up behind you).
3. Cyclists who don't know how to shift gears and therefore who are peddling way too hard and way to slow on easy hills.
4. Cyclists who need to lubricate their chain.
As to #1, yes, Lance does it, but you know, Lance is on a closed course on nicely paved roads. You're not. Act accordingly.
As to #2, it's just plain rude. Especially when you appear suddenly and very close to another runner or cyclist.
As to #3, it's more pity/embarassment for them than anything else. I mean, you've invested this much money in the thing, read a little and learn how to use it properly.
As to #4, well, I guess City Bikes is getting a lot of business out of people like that. :-/
Anyway, had to get those off my chest this morning. Otherwise it was a very nice run this morning, and I'm glad I did it since I skipped the planned run yesterday.
1. Cyclists who don't wear a helmet.
2. Cyclists who "sneak up on you" (i.e., they don't ring a bell or yell out or otherwise indicate that they are coming up behind you).
3. Cyclists who don't know how to shift gears and therefore who are peddling way too hard and way to slow on easy hills.
4. Cyclists who need to lubricate their chain.
As to #1, yes, Lance does it, but you know, Lance is on a closed course on nicely paved roads. You're not. Act accordingly.
As to #2, it's just plain rude. Especially when you appear suddenly and very close to another runner or cyclist.
As to #3, it's more pity/embarassment for them than anything else. I mean, you've invested this much money in the thing, read a little and learn how to use it properly.
As to #4, well, I guess City Bikes is getting a lot of business out of people like that. :-/
Anyway, had to get those off my chest this morning. Otherwise it was a very nice run this morning, and I'm glad I did it since I skipped the planned run yesterday.
no subject
Date: 2004-07-19 07:02 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-07-19 07:19 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-07-19 07:29 am (UTC)Just pointing out how the Lance comparison doesn't really work for recreational cyclists. :)
no subject
Date: 2004-07-19 07:20 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-07-19 07:55 am (UTC)no subject
runnerjogger stories from being on my bicycle, too (chief among them my ever so lovely August wipe-out from last year), but I find more of the cyclists to be clueless than the runners (and I refuse to call clueless people "runners" - those folks will perpetually be "joggers" to me). Perhaps it's the speed - the wind blowing through their empty ears must distract the few brain cells they have left. ;-pno subject
Date: 2004-07-19 08:10 am (UTC)There are some days when stationary bikes and treadmills are more and more appealing...
no subject
Date: 2004-07-19 08:46 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-07-19 09:30 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-07-19 01:20 pm (UTC)During competitions on the road, a rigid safety headgear shall be worn.
Except where there are legal provisions to the contrary, riders taking part in international events for elite men of class 4 and above may, at their own risk, remove their headgear during the final climb when the finish of the event or stage is on or at the summit of that climb, subject to the following conditions:
1) the climb in question is at least 5 km in length,
2) the headgear may not be removed at the start of the climb."
I keep hoping, though, that people who don't wear helmets (or wear them improperly, which may be worse *grrr*) will kill themselves as a result. A girl can dream, right? ;)