legalmoose: (Default)
[personal profile] legalmoose
For those who have asked about why I'd even be allowed to serve jury duty as an attorney, first a quip, then a more serious explanation.

1. They already exclude felons, if they excluded lawyers, too, there would be no one left to serve.

2. The District of Columbia has a limited number of potential jurors and a large number of cases to be heard. Only citizens of the District may serve, so that cuts out all the transients and those n'er-do-wells who live here but refuse to register themselves as real residents of the District, preferring to keep their legal residence elsewhere even though they really live here. As I alluded to above, felons who are still within ten years of having finished their sentence are also not allowed to serve as jurors. That cuts down the number of potential jurors by a very, very large percentage. Attorneys are not categorically excluded, though they are frequently the target of the usual non-commented upon strikes by one or both of the attorneys on either side during voir dire. I have heard of attorneys serving on petit juries, and as we know, I've served on two different grand juries in my 7 years in the District.

So, no, there's no categorical exemption (though I'd love it if we had Oklahoma's law, which excludes "attorneys, habitual drunkards and insane persons."), so unless i get striken, I have to serve. Luckily, today I was not called in for a panel, and it was a slow day, so they released those who had not been chosen for a panel at 2.

Date: 2006-06-20 08:23 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] echomn.livejournal.com
I feel like I should have taken notes on that for an upcoming final.

j/k :)

Date: 2006-06-20 08:28 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] matintin.livejournal.com
attorneys, habitual drunkards and insane persons

Rather redundant, non?

The trouble with having a non code-based legislative book (http://www.qp.gov.bc.ca/statreg/stat/J/96242_01.htm#section3) is that good stuff like that gets noticed and excised.
(deleted comment)

Date: 2006-06-20 08:47 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] fritterfae.livejournal.com
Judges get called for Jury Duty as well. The one who had the pool I was in last week said that he has to go sit in the jury room every two years as well and that he always gets cut in voir dire.

Date: 2006-06-20 09:21 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] moderatio.livejournal.com
It seems as if jurisdictions are heading in the direction of allowing attorneys to serve as jurors. The law professor who I worked for last summer served on a jury for about a week.

Date: 2006-06-20 10:08 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] blue02dude.livejournal.com
I would figure that lawyers would typically be preemptively struck out: the prosecution wouldn't want someone that really knows the ropes and could derail their case, and the defense wouldn't want someone that can't (easily) identify with the defendant.

-C

Date: 2006-06-21 02:33 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dipdewdog.livejournal.com
I've never been called to jury duty in the 5 years I've been registered to vote. I have a hunch this year will be my lucky year.

Date: 2006-06-21 03:55 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jarlsberg71.livejournal.com
I thought in Oklahoma you were exempt if it were 2 out of the 3 categories ;)

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags

March 2026

S M T W T F S
1234567
8910 11121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031    

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Page generated Apr. 2nd, 2026 05:57 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios